- Look Behind The Curtain
- Posts
- [FREE Sample] The New Ruling Class; Is The FBI Obstructing the J13 Investigation
[FREE Sample] The New Ruling Class; Is The FBI Obstructing the J13 Investigation
“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, with liberty and justice for all”
COMMENTARY
The New Ruling Class: An Examination of America's Elite and Their Impact on the Middle Class
In the sprawling political and cultural landscape of America, a discernible pattern has emerged—a pattern that reveals a new kind of ruling class. This isn’t a formal aristocracy, but rather an informal coalition of influential individuals and institutions concentrated mainly on the East Coast and in major urban centers. This elite have effectively seized control over significant aspects of American life, often operating in ways that appear disconnected from the realities and needs of the vast majority of Americans.
From Washington, D.C., to New York City and Los Angeles, this ruling class seems to orchestrate the nation’s priorities and policies, often disregarding the impact on ordinary citizens. Their influence extends beyond elected officials, affecting everything from cultural narratives to legislative actions through executive orders and bureaucratic regulations. This elite's interests and agendas frequently clash with those of middle-class Americans, leaving many feeling disenfranchised and unheard.
Disconnection from the Middle Class
The detachment of this ruling class is evident in their promotion of issues that, while significant in some circles, may seem irrelevant or even detrimental to the broader population. Take, for instance, the spotlight on transgender rights. While important to a minority, it dominates media discussions and policy debates, potentially overshadowing issues of greater concern to many, such as economic stability and job security.
Similarly, the emphasis on systemic racism, though crucial for addressing genuine injustices, is often wielded in ways that seem to undermine the traditional values and institutions that many in the middle class hold dear. Critics argue that these discussions can sometimes serve as a means to challenge the status quo rather than foster genuine progress.
Climate change is another arena where this ruling class’s priorities diverge from the needs of everyday Americans. The narrative surrounding climate change has been criticized as a guise for promoting deindustrialization and restricting individual freedoms. Policies aimed at reducing carbon footprints, such as the push for electric vehicles (EVs), often come across as impractical or unwanted by those who rely on traditional combustion engine vehicles for their livelihoods.
The Administrative State’s Reach
One of the most concerning aspects of this new ruling class is its reliance on executive fiat and bureaucratic regulation to implement policies without direct public consent. Actions by agencies like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are reshaping American life—mandating high-density living arrangements and restricting personal vehicle choices—without the explicit backing of voters.
This shift from democratic processes to executive orders and regulations underscores a broader trend where power is increasingly centralized in a way that bypasses traditional checks and balances. It reflects a move toward greater control over citizens’ lives, often justified by promises of environmental or social benefits, but frequently resulting in significant inconveniences and unintended consequences.
The Ideological Battle
The ideological conflicts between the ruling class and the middle class are evident in the ongoing debates over issues like Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI). While DEI initiatives aim to address historical inequities, they are sometimes criticized for undermining meritocracy and fostering division. The emphasis on these initiatives is seen by some as part of a broader effort to reshape societal norms in ways that may not align with the values of many middle-class Americans.
Moreover, the attack on traditional values and institutions is not limited to DEI. Recent criticisms of Christian nationalism and historical narratives about America’s founding reflect a broader ideological struggle. The assertion that the U.S. Constitution was designed to uphold slavery, for instance, is seen by many as an attempt to rewrite history to fit a contemporary ideological framework.
Power and Representation
The power dynamics at play extend to electoral politics as well. Proposals to eliminate the Electoral College, for instance, are viewed by some as attempts to disenfranchise less populous regions and concentrate power in urban centers. Such moves are seen as part of a larger strategy to reshape American democracy in ways that align more closely with the interests of the ruling class.
The current political climate also sees a growing concentration of power in the federal government, which some argue is increasingly intrusive and authoritarian. The administration’s efforts to suppress dissent and monitor political opponents are seen as part of a broader strategy to stifle opposition and consolidate control.
A Call for Awareness
The critique of this new ruling class is not merely about opposing specific policies but about recognizing a broader pattern of disconnection and control. The focus should be on understanding how this elite’s actions impact the average American and advocating for a return to more representative and accountable governance.
As Ted McAllister of Pepperdine University aptly put it, today’s elite are characterized by their detachment from historical knowledge and their pursuit of transformative change at the expense of established values and traditions. This detachment is not just a matter of political or economic power; it represents a fundamental shift in how society’s elites engage with the rest of the country.
In the end, the challenge for middle-class Americans is to remain vigilant and engaged, to question the motives behind the policies promoted by this ruling class, and to strive for a political and cultural landscape that truly represents and serves the interests of all citizens, not just a select few.
Source: From Comments by Mark Levin on August 11,2024
TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT
Has The FBI Obstructed The Trump Assassination Investigation?
Dr. Chris Martenson’s Citizen’s Investigation
Representative Clay Higgins from LA, deployed his prior LEO and investigative experience on site in Butler PA between Aug 4th and 6th.
The most shocking findings were that the FBI had already committed four egregious violations of standard investigation practices.
The FBI released all the First Responders that same evening, with the bulk seen wandering off to their cars less than two hours after the shooting.
The FBI physically cleaned up the crime scene including the blood and other biological material on the roof of AGR building 6.
The FBI released Crooks’ body for cremation on July 23rd, without notifying anybody especially and including the various government bodies investigating J13.
The FBI released the entire crime scene in just three days.
These actions rise to the level of obstruction of investigation and cannot be the product of incompetence, no matter how profound that might be or how long-running their DEI programs. It’s far more consistent with an intentional act to bury the investigation and assure no firm conclusions can ever be drawn.
For their part the Secret Service’s own actions are equally shady. The nose-wrinkling facts are these:
Had Counter Snipers On Trump For The First Time Ever
Deployed Them Stupidly
Instructed Local LEO To Inside B6 Positions in Southwest Corner
Didn’t Attend Meetings
No Day-Of Briefing With Locals
Didn’t Use Local Provided Radios
Declined/Refused Drone
Didn’t Even Communicate With Themselves as the stage team left Trump on the stage even as their sniper teams were swiveling about and readying for action
Didn’t Interview or Debrief Any Local LEOs As Of August 9th
It tell you, it’s almost like the government has no interest in finding out what happened, for some reason.
Source: Peak Prosperity - August 16, 2024
Click image to watch the following video (37 minutes)
FBI fires back at claims it released Crooks' body for cremation days after Trump assassination attempt
August 16, 2024, - 3:23pm - The FBI has denied allegations by Rep. Clay Higgins, R-La., that the agency obstructed the investigation into the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump by prematurely releasing the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks for cremation. Higgins, who is part of a bipartisan congressional task force, claims the FBI’s actions hindered further investigation, including the handling of the crime scene. The FBI refutes these claims, stating that all procedures were followed in coordination with local authorities, and that the crime scene was released in phases with proper documentation. The agency emphasizes its commitment to transparency and cooperation with Congress.
See Full Story at FoxNews
Our Publishing Policy… A twice weekly newsletter providing readers with curated, authoritative, common sense, commentary and information on a variety of subjects not generally or readily found on mainstream media outlets. Some of the information may be controversial, however, we believe that it is important to consider different points of view when forming your opinions and beliefs, especially in the current propaganda driven media environment. Due to the censorship climate existing today and because we have paid subscriptions to many platforms ,we hope you’ll understand the need for ours to be a paid platform. as well. We appreciate your support.
Reply